CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 15, 2026, 1:16 AM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
48/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability47%Agent Easeof Use47%Security& Trust83%GEO, AIO, AEO61%SEO92%Performance71%Accessibility0%
  • AI Discoverability 47 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 47 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 83 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 61 out of 100
  • SEO 92 out of 100
  • Performance 71 out of 100
  • Accessibility 0 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

HUG Technik und Sicherheit | Industrietechnik und Arbeitsschutz favicon

HUG Technik und Sicherheit | Industrietechnik und Arbeitsschutz

Der Online-Shop für den technischen Industriebedarf und Arbeitssicherheit. Alles aus einer Hand ✔️Industrie ✔️Handwerk ✔️Kommunen ✔️Privat

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
47
Priority fix1831View details
Discoverability
47
Priority fix600
Content Readiness
37
Priority fix900
Bot Access Control
54
Needs work331View details
Agent Ease of Use
47
Priority fix110View details
Google Agentic Browsing
33
Priority fix110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
61
Needs work822View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable300
AEO Readiness
42
Priority fix222View details
SEO
92
Strong900
SEO
92
Strong900
Security & Trust
83
Mostly ready2000
Security & Trust
83
Mostly ready2000
Performance
71
Needs work1200
Performance
71
Needs work1200

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

6 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEmerging recommendation

ai.txt policy

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

82 Fail

Needs attention

ai.txt policy

Failed check
01

Issue

/ai.txt returned HTTP 500.

Details

02

Why it matters

ai.txt is a fragmented emerging convention. It can communicate human-readable AI crawling, training, attribution, restriction, and contact guidance, but it is not a standard access-control mechanism and absence should not be penalized.

Check name

ai.txt policy

Score

18/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Publish an advisory human-readable AI usage policy only when the site intentionally needs one.

Result

ai.txt policy failed at "Fetch /ai.txt".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch /ai.txt

    /ai.txt returned HTTP 500.

    /ai.txt could not be fetched when present
  2. Validate transport

    ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.

    /ai.txt transport is invalid or not plain text
  3. Parse ai.txt policy

    Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.

    /ai.txt policy format is missing required sections or non-standard
  4. Validate policy content

    ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

    /ai.txt content is incomplete or unsafe
Evidence log4 steps · 18 lines
Fetch /ai.txt [fail]! /ai.txt returned HTTP 500.INFOFetch /ai.txtINFORequesting optional advisory policy file at /ai.txtFAILCompare /ai.txt HTTP response actual=500 expected="2xx when ai.txt is intentionally published; 404/410 means absent optional file" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" length=106194FAIL/ai.txt returned HTTP 500. statusCode=500Validate transport [fail]! ai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.INFOValidate transportINFOChecking ai.txt media type, size, line count, and whether the response looks like plain text contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" length=106194 lineCount=1241FAILCompare media type to preferred text/plain transport actual="text/html" expected="text/plain preferred; readable text required"FAILai.txt appears to be an HTML page or error document rather than a plain-text policy.Parse ai.txt policy [fail]! Transport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.INFOParse ai.txt policyINFODetecting ai.txt convention from bracket sections, frontmatter, headings, and ai.txt context linksINFODetected policy structure convention="generic-markdown" sections=[] markdownHeadings=[]WARNCheck AI Visibility required sections actual="missing identity, permissions, restrictions" expected="identity, permissions, and restrictions" missingRecommended=["attribution","contact","content-types"]WARNTransport validation failed before policy parsing could be trusted.Validate policy content [warning]! ai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.INFOValidate policy contentINFOChecking required section content, permission/restriction language, attribution, contact details, and safety risks convention="generic-markdown"INFODetected policy signals hasPermissionLanguage=false hasRestrictionLanguage=false hasTrainingLanguage=false hasAttributionLanguage=true hasContact=falseWARNCheck required and recommended section coverage actual={"missingRequired":["identity","permissions","restrictions"],"missingRecommended":["attribution","contact","content-types"]} expected={"missingRequired":[],"recommendedPresentWhenPossible":true}WARNai.txt does not follow the AI Visibility section model; treating it as non-standard advisory text.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

9 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

245 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

6 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs, policyLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

29/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

4 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

50/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 50/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 63/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 3. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

63/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 63/100 and needs improvement.

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 43 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history