CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

SCANNED
Jul 11, 2026, 9:53 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
61/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability51%Agent Easeof Use57%Security& Trust41%GEO, AIO, AEO47%SEO100%Performance77%Accessibility100%
  • AI Discoverability 51 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 57 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 41 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 47 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 77 out of 100
  • Accessibility 100 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

Forsiden - Lovdata favicon

Forsiden - Lovdata

Offisiell kunngjøring av endringer i norske lover og forskrifter. Gratis tilgang til gjeldende lover og forskrifter, traktater og nye dommer.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
51
Needs work2331View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
29
Priority fix1231View details
Bot Access Control
56
Needs work300
Agent Ease of Use
57
Needs work1941View details
API
37
Priority fix341View details
Auth
54
Needs work500
MCP
45
Priority fix200
Agent Commerce
58
Needs work700
Google Agentic Browsing
100
Strong200
GEO, AIO and AEO
47
Priority fix523View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
37
Priority fix123View details
SEO
100
Strong900
SEO
100
Strong900
Security & Trust
41
Priority fix700
Security & Trust
41
Priority fix700
Performance
77
Mostly ready1300
Performance
77
Mostly ready1300

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Author attribution

Author attribution is partially implemented.

95 Fail

Needs attention

Author attribution

Failed check
01

Issue

Applicable editorial content has no usable author, creator, publisher, visible byline, or HTML attribution signal.

Details

02

Why it matters

Author attribution helps agents cite content responsibly, assess source credibility, and distinguish editorial pages from anonymous marketing copy.

Check name

Author attribution

Score

5/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Identify content authors or publishers for trust and attribution.

Result

Author attribution is partially implemented.

Validation steps

  1. Schema.org attribution

    Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.

    Schema.org author attribution is missing or incomplete
  2. Author identity quality

    No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.

    Author identity quality is incomplete
  3. Visible byline parity

    Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.

    Author attribution does not match visible byline content
  4. HTML attribution support

    No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.

    HTML author attribution support is missing
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Schema.org attribution [fail]! Editorial content has no Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution.INFOSchema.org attributionINFOChecking structured data for author, creator, and publisher contributorsFAILCheck named Schema.org author count actual=0 expected="> 0" authorCount=0 publisherCount=0 namedContributors=0 authors=[] publishers=[] formats=[]FAILNo Schema.org author, creator, or publisher attribution foundAuthor identity quality [fail]! No named author or publisher identity could be extracted.INFOAuthor identity qualityINFOChecking contributors for stable identity signalsFAILCheck identified contributor count actual=0 expected="> 0" namedContributors=0 identifiedContributors=[] unidentifiedContributors=[]FAILNo named contributor identity could be extractedVisible byline parity [fail]! Structured author/publisher names were not found in visible byline text.INFOVisible byline parityINFOComparing structured contributor names with visible byline evidenceFAILCheck visible attribution matches actual=0 expected="> 0 or visible byline present" visibleByline=false bylineCount=0FAILNo visible byline parity foundHTML attribution support [warning]! No supporting HTML author metadata, rel=author link, or visible byline was found.INFOHTML attribution supportINFOChecking meta author, rel=author, and visible byline supportWARNCheck HTML attribution support signals actual=0 expected="> 0" metaAuthor=false relAuthor=false visibleByline=falseWARNNo supporting HTML attribution signal found

Agent Ease of UseAPIEstablished

API Catalog

API Catalog failed at "Validate API catalog media type".

63 Fail

Needs attention

API Catalog

Failed check
01

Issue

Content-Type "text/html;charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.

Details

02

Why it matters

API catalogs help agents find API endpoints, service descriptions, documentation, status resources, auth metadata, and related machine-readable contracts without guessing entry points.

Check name

API Catalog

Score

37/100

Status

fail

Category

API

Maturity

Established

Goal

Publish an API catalog for automated public API discovery using RFC 9727 when this origin exposes public APIs.

Result

API Catalog failed at "Validate API catalog media type".

Validation steps

  1. Check API catalog HEAD Link header

    HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".

    API catalog HEAD Link discovery is incomplete
  2. Validate API catalog media type

    Content-Type "text/html;charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.

    API catalog media type is not application/linkset+json
  3. Validate Linkset shape

    Unexpected token '<', " <!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSON

    API catalog Linkset shape is invalid

    Unexpected token '<', " <!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSON

  4. Classify API catalog relations

    API catalog did not include API endpoint links or useful API discovery relations.

    API catalog lacks useful API relations
  5. Validate API catalog targets

    API catalog did not expose any href targets to validate.

    API catalog targets are unreachable or media types mismatch
Evidence log5 steps · 23 lines
Check API catalog HEAD Link header [warning]! HEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog".INFOCheck API catalog HEAD Link headerINFOSend HEAD request to API catalog path attempted=true statusCode=200 contentType="text/html;charset=utf-8"WARNCompare HEAD Link rel=api-catalog count actual=0 expected="> 0"WARNHEAD /.well-known/api-catalog did not expose a Link header with rel="api-catalog". status="warning"Validate API catalog media type [fail]! Content-Type "text/html;charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.INFOValidate API catalog media typeFAILCompare API catalog media type actual="text/html;charset=utf-8" expected="application/linkset+json"FAILCompare JSON compatibility fallback actual=false expected=trueFAILContent-Type "text/html;charset=utf-8" is not valid for an RFC 9727 API catalog.Validate Linkset shape [fail]! Unexpected token '<', "
<!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSONINFOValidate Linkset shapeFAILCompare Linkset JSON parse result actual=false expected=trueFAILCompare top-level linkset item count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILCompare extracted href target count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILLinkset shape issue issue="Unexpected token '<', \"\n<!DOCTYPE \"... is not valid JSON"FAILLinkset JSON parse error error="Unexpected token '<', \"\n<!DOCTYPE \"... is not valid JSON"FAILUnexpected token '<', "
<!DOCTYPE "... is not valid JSONClassify API catalog relations [fail]! API catalog did not include API endpoint links or useful API discovery relations.INFOClassify API catalog relationsINFOClassify API catalog relation types relations=[] summary={"registered":[],"metadata":[],"adjacent":[],"community":[],"legacy":[],"unknown":[]}FAILCompare registered or metadata API relation count actual=0 expected="> 0"FAILAPI catalog did not include API endpoint links or useful API discovery relations.Validate API catalog targets [fail]! API catalog did not expose any href targets to validate.INFOValidate API catalog targetsINFOFetch same-origin API catalog targets and record same-site/external skipsFAILCompare API catalog target failure count actual=0 expected=0FAILAPI catalog did not expose any href targets to validate.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

15 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

5 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs, policyLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

29/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 61/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 3. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

61/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 61/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-surface controls

AEO: Answer-surface controls scored 65/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-surface controls

Warning
01

Issue

6 answer retrieval crawler(s) are blocked for the scanned path.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-surface controls

Score

65/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-surface controls scored 65/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 82/100 and needs improvement.

1 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Warning
01

Issue

Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

82/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 82/100 and needs improvement.

Sign in to see 43 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history