Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 32 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
- Security & Trust 46 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 55 out of 100
- SEO 100 out of 100
- Performance 40 out of 100
- Accessibility 87 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
Вести: новости России и мира сегодня, последние события дня, фото, видео
Последние новости дня на сайте Вести: интервью, репортажи, фото и видео. Свежие новости Москвы, регионов России и всего мира на сегодня – экономика, пенсии, авто, политика, наука, погода и другие. Будьте в курсе актуальных событий.
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 32 | Priority fix | 11 | 4 | 1 | View details |
| Discoverability | 40 | Priority fix | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 9 | Priority fix | 6 | 3 | 1 | View details |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 50 | Needs work | 5 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| API | 50 | Needs work | 4 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 50 | Needs work | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 55 | Needs work | 6 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 100 | Strong | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 46 | Priority fix | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 46 | Priority fix | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 40 | Priority fix | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 40 | Priority fix | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
3 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
100 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished
Content freshness signals
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Needs attention
Content freshness signals
Issue
Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.
Details
Why it matters
Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.
Check name
Content freshness signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
Content Readiness
Maturity
Established
Goal
Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.
Result
Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.
Validation steps
Validate Last-Modified header
No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.
Validate structured freshness dates
No Schema.org freshness dates were found.
Validate metadata freshness dates
No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.
Corroborate with sitemap lastmod
Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.
Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=6WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="no match" expected="valid match when available" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=6
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
100 Fail
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Check name
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Google Agentic Browsing
Fix guidance
A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.
References
https://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-webEvidence
{
"description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}Sign in to see 41 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history
Public scan score over time
Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.
| Scan date | Score | Readiness | Report |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49/100 | Level 2, Agent-Limited | Current report |