CanAgentUse

https://brm.io/
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
New Scan
https://brm.io/
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
54/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability43%Agent Easeof Use50%Security& Trust45%GEO, AIO, AEO33%SEO100%Performance100%Accessibility79%
  • AI Discoverability 43 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 50 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 45 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 33 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 100 out of 100
  • Accessibility 79 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

code by @liabru · web & front-end developer · software engineer favicon

code by @liabru · web & front-end developer · software engineer

Projects and other things by @liabru · Matter.js · matchHeight · Fractal Gears · Kwyjibo · more

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

3 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
43
Priority fix1941View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
18
Priority fix1031View details
Bot Access Control
45
Priority fix110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
33
Priority fix332View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AEO Readiness
26
Priority fix132View details
SEO
100
Strong900
SEO
100
Strong900
Security & Trust
45
Priority fix700
Security & Trust
45
Priority fix700
Performance
100
Strong2000
Performance
100
Strong2000

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityContent ReadinessEstablished

Content freshness signals

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

100 Fail

Needs attention

Content freshness signals

Failed check
01

Issue

Content freshness signals are incomplete: missing any valid freshness date in Last-Modified, Schema.org, Open Graph, Dublin Core, generic meta, or sitemap lastmod.

Details

02

Why it matters

Freshness signals help agents, crawlers, and search systems decide whether content is current enough to cite, summarize, cache, or compare against newer sources.

Check name

Content freshness signals

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

Content Readiness

Maturity

Established

Goal

Expose modified and published dates for freshness-aware retrieval, citation, and ranking.

Result

Content freshness signals is missing or incomplete.

Validation steps

  1. Validate Last-Modified header

    No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.

  2. Validate structured freshness dates

    No Schema.org freshness dates were found.

  3. Validate metadata freshness dates

    No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.

  4. Corroborate with sitemap lastmod

    Add a sitemap entry with a valid lastmod for the canonical page URL when sitemap corroboration is useful.

Evidence log4 steps · 16 lines
Validate Last-Modified header [fail]! No valid Last-Modified HTTP header was found.INFOValidate Last-Modified headerINFOReading Last-Modified response headerFAILCheck Last-Modified header is present and parseable actual="missing" expected="valid" alternateDates=[]FAILLast-Modified header is missing or invalidValidate structured freshness dates [fail]! No Schema.org freshness dates were found.INFOValidate structured freshness datesINFOCollecting Schema.org freshness dates from JSON-LD, Microdata, and RDFaFAILCheck structured freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" invalidDateCount=0 formats={} alternateDates=[]FAILNo structured freshness dates foundValidate metadata freshness dates [fail]! No Open Graph, Dublin Core, or generic meta freshness date was found.INFOValidate metadata freshness datesINFOCollecting Open Graph, Dublin Core, and generic meta freshness datesFAILCheck metadata freshness date count actual=0 expected="> 0" metaDateCount=0 invalidDateCount=0 alternateDates=[]FAILNo metadata freshness dates foundCorroborate with sitemap lastmod [warning]INFOCorroborate with sitemap lastmodINFODiscovering sitemap candidates and matching the scanned page URL candidateCount=1 attempts=1WARNCheck matching sitemap lastmod actual="invalid match" expected="valid match when available" sitemapUrl="https://brm.io/sitemap.xml" robotsStatusCode=200WARNNo matching sitemap lastmod found after sitemap attempts attempts=1

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

69 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Failed check
01

Issue

5 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

5 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs, policyLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

29/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 29/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 44/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Failed check
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. Heading structure issues were detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 44/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 56/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Warning
01

Issue

Only 62 visible words were detected for answer extraction. Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

56/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 56/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Warning
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 0. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

62/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.

Sign in to see 30 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Development Note:

Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
54/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report