CanAgentUse

https://cutt.ly/
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
New Scan
https://cutt.ly/
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
71/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 3, Bot-Aware

Moderate readiness for AI agents
AIDiscoverability61%Agent Easeof Use54%Security& Trust95%GEO, AIO, AEO72%SEO100%Performance99%Accessibility93%
  • AI Discoverability 61 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 54 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 95 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 72 out of 100
  • SEO 100 out of 100
  • Performance 99 out of 100
  • Accessibility 93 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

URL Shortener with Branded Short Links & QR Codes | Cuttly favicon

URL Shortener with Branded Short Links & QR Codes | Cuttly

URL Shortener with branded short links & QR Codes. Shorten long URLs instantly, track every click. Link in Bio, Campaigns, Surveys and Teams in one platform.

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
61
Needs work2910View details
Discoverability
67
Needs work800
Content Readiness
74
Needs work2000
Bot Access Control
45
Priority fix110View details
Agent Ease of Use
54
Needs work200
API
67
Needs work200
GEO, AIO and AEO
72
Needs work1112View details
GEO Readiness
61
Needs work312View details
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable400
AEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable400
SEO
100
Strong1000
SEO
100
Strong1000
Security & Trust
95
Strong2600
Security & Trust
95
Strong2600
Performance
99
Strong1810View details
Performance
99
Strong1810View details

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

5 items need attention

AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished

AI bot rules in robots.txt

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

69 Fail

Needs attention

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Failed check
01

Issue

No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

02

Why it matters

AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.

Check name

AI bot rules in robots.txt

Score

31/100

Status

fail

Category

Bot Access Control

Maturity

Established

Goal

Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.

Result

AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".

Validation steps

  1. Classify AI crawler rules

    No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.

Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Citable passages

GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

12 Fail

Needs attention

GEO: Citable passages

Failed check
01

Issue

No evidence-backed, citation-length explanatory paragraph was found.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Citable passages

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Citable passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Structured extraction

GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Structured extraction

Warning
01

Issue

Missing or weak extraction signals: clean heading hierarchy, summary or key takeaways.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Structured extraction

Score

75/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Structured extraction scored 75/100 and needs improvement.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

GEO: Source and trust signals

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.

2 Warning

Needs attention

GEO: Source and trust signals

Warning
01

Issue

Missing source or trust signals: freshnessDate.

Details

02

Why it matters

Generative answer systems work best with visible, self-contained, evidence-backed content, clear entities, trustworthy attribution, structured page sections, and crawler-accessible HTML. These signals improve machine understanding even though they do not guarantee AI citations.

Check name

GEO: Source and trust signals

Score

83/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for AI answer engines to extract, cite, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

GEO: Source and trust signals scored 83/100 and needs improvement.

PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit

Forced reflow

100 Fail

Check name

Forced reflow

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Performance

Fix guidance

A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A forced reflow occurs when JavaScript queries geometric properties (such as offsetWidth) after styles have been invalidated by a change to the DOM state. This can result in poor performance. Learn more about [forced reflows](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/performance/insights/forced-reflow) and possible mitigations."
}

Sign in to see 29 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Development Note:

Please configure GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID in .env to activate live login.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Score history

Public scan score over time

Public reports for this website origin. Select any point or report link to open that canonical report.

1 reports
Public score history report links
Scan dateScoreReadinessReport
71/100Level 3, Bot-AwareCurrent report