CanAgentUse

CanAgentUse products

Agentic Browsing AuditCheck dialogs, menus, drawers, popovers, form errors, checkout steps, and other UI states that a standard Lighthouse scan may not capture.View product MCP ServerInstall CanAgentUse in your coding agent so scan findings become repo-ready fixes.View product WooCommerce PluginPublish UCP discovery and agent-ready commerce signals from WooCommerce without rebuilding checkout.View product Shopify PluginAdd UCP discovery, storefront metadata checks, and controlled cart-to-checkout flows for shopping agents.View product AgentReady CIScan commits and PRs, publish reports, and choose which agent-readiness failures should block merges.View product

CanAgentUse tools

UCP Suite

Validate Universal Commerce Protocol discovery, then test product search, carts, checkout links, and merchant handoff flows.

UCP ValidatorUCP Playground

MCP Playground

Connect to remote MCP servers, inspect tools and resources, test prompts, auth, headers, notifications, and JSON-RPC responses.

MCP Playground

A2A Playground

Inspect Agent Cards, validate advertised endpoints, and prepare safe requests for agent-to-agent workflows.

A2A Playground

Agent Website Viewer

Enter a public URL and see the roles, names, landmarks, controls, and blockers that shape how AI agents understand the page.

Agent Website Viewer
New Scan
https://gestigymcloud.com/
SCANNED
Jul 11, 2026, 5:26 PM
VISIBILITY
Public
SUITE2026.06.10
Rescan Report
Share Report
Copy Report Link
Export Report
36/100

OVERALL SCORE

Level 2, Agent-Limited

Priority improvements needed for AI agents
AIDiscoverability27%Agent Easeof Use46%Security& Trust45%GEO, AIO, AEO26%SEO91%Performance51%Accessibility21%
  • AI Discoverability 27 out of 100
  • Agent Ease of Use 46 out of 100
  • Security & Trust 45 out of 100
  • GEO, AIO and AEO 26 out of 100
  • SEO 91 out of 100
  • Performance 51 out of 100
  • Accessibility 21 out of 100

CAPTURED SCREENSHOT

Captured website desktop screenshot

What AI sees of your website

GestiGym Cloud favicon

GestiGym Cloud

No page metadata or readable excerpt was captured.

Open Agent View

Next step

Turn this report into a fix workflow

2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI
Detailed report scores grouped by capability area
MetricScoreStatusPassedFailedWarningEvidence
AI Discoverability
27
Priority fix1000
Discoverability
40
Priority fix400
Content Readiness
5
Priority fix400
Bot Access Control
34
Priority fix200
Agent Ease of Use
46
Priority fix2231View details
API
37
Priority fix300
Auth
54
Needs work500
MCP
42
Priority fix400
Skill Discovery
51
Needs work200
Agent Commerce
45
Priority fix721View details
Google Agentic Browsing
50
Needs work110View details
GEO, AIO and AEO
26
Priority fix441View details
GEO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable100
AIO Readiness
Not Applicable
Not Applicable200
AEO Readiness
22
Priority fix141View details
SEO
91
Strong700
SEO
91
Strong700
Security & Trust
45
Priority fix700
Security & Trust
45
Priority fix700
Performance
51
Needs work1400
Performance
51
Needs work1400

Prioritized recommendations

Issues ranked by score impact

7 items need attention

Agent Ease of UseAgent CommerceInformational

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol failed at "Fetch ACP discovery".

58 Fail

Needs attention

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

Failed check
01

Issue

ACP discovery was reachable but did not parse as JSON.

Details

02

Why it matters

ACP discovery lets agents find the seller's ACP API base URL, supported versions, transports, and stable services before attempting authenticated checkout-session negotiation.

Check name

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol

Score

42/100

Status

fail

Category

Agent Commerce

Maturity

Informational

Goal

Expose valid ACP discovery when this origin supports Agentic Commerce Protocol workflows.

Result

ACP - Agentic Commerce Protocol failed at "Fetch ACP discovery".

Validation steps

  1. Fetch ACP discovery

    ACP discovery was reachable but did not parse as JSON.

    ACP discovery is missing or not parseable

  2. Validate ACP discovery shape

    ACP discovery could not be parsed.

    ACP discovery protocol metadata is invalid

  3. Review ACP cache and retry metadata

    ACP discovery Cache-Control does not include max-age.

    ACP discovery cache or retry metadata needs review
Evidence log3 steps · 14 lines
Fetch ACP discovery [fail]! ACP discovery was reachable but did not parse as JSON.INFOFetch ACP discovery status="fail"INFOFetch canonical ACP discovery /.well-known/acp.json statusCode=204 contentType=null parsed=false error="Unexpected end of JSON input"FAILCheck canonical ACP discovery response actual=false expected=true canonicalFound=trueFAILACP discovery was reachable but did not parse as JSON.Validate ACP discovery shape [fail]! ACP discovery could not be parsed.INFOValidate ACP discovery shape status="fail"INFOValidate ACP protocol object, name, date version, and supported_versions orderingFAILCheck protocol object and name actual={"hasProtocol":false} expected={"hasProtocol":true,"protocolName":"acp"}FAILCheck protocol version history actual={"supportedVersionCount":0,"supportedVersionsOrdered":false,"supportedVersionsEndWithCurrent":false} expected="date version with chronological supported_versions ending in current version"FAILACP discovery could not be parsed.Review ACP cache and retry metadata [warning]! ACP discovery Cache-Control does not include max-age.INFOReview ACP cache and retry metadata status="warning"INFOInspect ACP discovery cache headers and retry guidance statusCode=204 cacheControl="no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate" retryAfter=nullWARNCheck Cache-Control header on successful discovery actual="no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate" expected="present for cacheable public discovery"WARNCheck Retry-After on rate-limit or unavailable responses actual="not required" expected="present only for 429 or 503"WARNACP discovery Cache-Control does not include max-age.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Evidence and trust

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

7 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Evidence and trust

Failed check
01

Issue

Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sources, sameAs, aboutOrContact, policyLinks.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Evidence and trust

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Evidence and trust scored 0/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Question and answer structure

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 40/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Question and answer structure

Failed check
01

Issue

No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. Heading structure issues were detected. No list or table answer format was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Question and answer structure

Score

40/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Question and answer structure scored 40/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 44/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Failed check
01

Issue

Expected exactly one h1, found 0. Missing meta description or Open Graph description. No direct definition sentence was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Entity and definition clarity

Score

44/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 44/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Extractable visible copy

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 46/100 and needs a fix.

4 Fail

Needs attention

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Failed check
01

Issue

Only 19 visible words were detected for answer extraction. Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Extractable visible copy

Score

46/100

Status

fail

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 46/100 and needs a fix.

GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation

AEO: Answer-first passages

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

3 Warning

Needs attention

AEO: Answer-first passages

Warning
01

Issue

No h2/h3 answer sections were detected. No direct definition pattern was detected.

Details

02

Why it matters

Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.

Check name

AEO: Answer-first passages

Score

55/100

Status

warning

Category

GEO, AIO & AEO

Maturity

Emerging recommendation

Goal

Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.

Result

AEO: Answer-first passages scored 55/100 and needs improvement.

Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

100 Fail

Check name

Accessibility tree is not well-formed

Score

0/100

Status

fail

Device

desktop

Category

Google Agentic Browsing

Fix guidance

A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.

Evidence
{
  "description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](http://goo.gle/lighthouse-agentic-a11y) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}

Sign in to see 50 other issues and the full report

Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.

Fix with MCP or CLI

Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.

Fix with MCP / CLI

Score history