Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 55 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 55 out of 100
- Security & Trust 56 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 36 out of 100
- SEO 92 out of 100
- Performance 44 out of 100
- Accessibility 0 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
熊猫出行-您的公共交通出行专家|企业班车|智慧校车|企业通勤车管理平台|公交出行APP
熊猫出行定制公交平台、班车平台-为您提供数字化班车运营解决方案!熊猫出行班车软件-帮助企业轻松管理班车信息,班车APP实时掌握运营状况,节约班车运营成本!熊猫出行班车系统-为企业完善班车管理、班车收费系统。熊猫出行通勤车平台、通勤车管理、通勤车系统、通勤车软件、通勤车app、定制公交、定制公交软件、智能公交等服务,提升员工幸福感!
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
1 failed check is ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 55 | Needs work | 22 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 55 | Needs work | 13 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 55 | Needs work | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 78 | Mostly ready | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 36 | Priority fix | 4 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | 59 | Needs work | 2 | 1 | 3 | View details |
| AEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 92 | Strong | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 56 | Needs work | 12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 56 | Needs work | 12 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 44 | Priority fix | 10 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Performance | 44 | Priority fix | 10 | 1 | 0 | View details |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
6 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Details
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
8 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Source and trust signals
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AIO: Source and trust signals
Issue
Missing AIO trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, aboutOrContact, policyLinks, sourceLinks.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Source and trust signals
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Source and trust signals scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Page experience proxy
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Page experience proxy
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Page experience proxy
Issue
Only 51 words of visible rendered text were detected. 40 image(s) are missing width/height attributes.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Page experience proxy
Score
55/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Page experience proxy scored 55/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 64/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Visible content clarity
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 64/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Visible content clarity
Issue
Expected exactly one h1, found 0. Only 51 visible words were detected. Heading outline issues were detected.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Visible content clarity
Score
64/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Visible content clarity scored 64/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Google Search eligibility
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AIO: Google Search eligibility
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AIO: Google Search eligibility
Issue
Canonical tag is missing.
Details
Why it matters
Google AI Overviews and AI Mode depend on normal Google Search eligibility, snippet permissions, useful visible content, consistent structured data, trust signals, and page experience basics. These signals help Google understand and preview a page, but they do not guarantee selection.
Check name
AIO: Google Search eligibility
Score
85/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content eligible, understandable, and previewable for Google Search AI features without promising inclusion.
Result
AIO: Google Search eligibility scored 85/100 and needs improvement.
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
100 Fail
PerformancePerformanceBrowser audit
Avoid large layout shifts
Check name
Avoid large layout shifts
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Performance
Estimated savings
1 layout shift found
Fix guidance
These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)
References
web.dev/learn/performanceEvidence
{
"displayValue": "1 layout shift found",
"description": "These are the largest layout shifts observed on the page. Each table item represents a single layout shift, and shows the element that shifted the most. Below each item are possible root causes that led to the layout shift. Some of these layout shifts may not be included in the CLS metric value due to [windowing](https://web.dev/articles/cls#what_is_cls). [Learn how to improve CLS](https://web.dev/articles/optimize-cls)"
}Sign in to see 43 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history