Export Report
OVERALL SCORE
Level 2, Agent-Limited
- AI Discoverability 43 out of 100
- Agent Ease of Use 45 out of 100
- Security & Trust 52 out of 100
- GEO, AIO and AEO 50 out of 100
- SEO 77 out of 100
- Performance 49 out of 100
- Accessibility 0 out of 100
What AI sees of your website
海外FX 比較 ランキング 2024 最新 徹底比較 & 口座開設 サポート ナビ 海外FX74 - 海外FX ランキング 2024 海外FX業者比較表 海外FX74
当サイト 海外FX74 では、海外FX、国内FX を含め、FX業者、証券会社等、約80社ほどの口座開設経験、14年以上の海外FXトレード経験を持つサイト開設者が、トレード経験豊富な中級者や初心者の方にも、自分に合う業者を選びやすいように、日本語対応の海外FX業者を中心に、人気上昇中や定番の人気を誇る海外FX業者の情報をお届けしています。ボーナス 税金 口座開設ボーナス おすすめ 確定申告 スプレット, レバレッジ ランキング スキャルピング ウェルカムボーナス と 業者 比...
Next step
Turn this report into a fix workflow
2 failed checks are ready to move into MCP or CLI remediation. Generate a repair prompt, connect the scanner to your coding agent, or open the integration docs before your next rescan.
| Metric | Score | Status | Passed | Failed | Warning | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Discoverability | 43 | Priority fix | 17 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Discoverability | 67 | Needs work | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Content Readiness | 15 | Priority fix | 8 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bot Access Control | 45 | Priority fix | 1 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Agent Ease of Use | 45 | Priority fix | 0 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| Google Agentic Browsing | 25 | Priority fix | 0 | 1 | 0 | View details |
| GEO, AIO and AEO | 50 | Needs work | 6 | 3 | 2 | View details |
| GEO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| AIO Readiness | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| AEO Readiness | 26 | Priority fix | 1 | 3 | 2 | View details |
| SEO | 77 | Mostly ready | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| SEO | 77 | Mostly ready | 7 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 52 | Needs work | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Security & Trust | 52 | Needs work | 9 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 49 | Priority fix | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Performance | 49 | Priority fix | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Prioritized recommendations
Issues ranked by score impact
7 items need attention
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
69 Fail
AI DiscoverabilityBot Access ControlEstablished
AI bot rules in robots.txt
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Needs attention
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Issue
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
Details
Why it matters
AI crawler product tokens have different meanings. Explicit robots.txt groups make training, search, and retrieval access policy auditable for compliant crawler operators.
Check name
AI bot rules in robots.txt
Score
31/100
Status
fail
Category
Bot Access Control
Maturity
Established
Goal
Declare deliberate robots.txt rules for major AI training, AI search, user-triggered, and dataset crawlers.
Result
AI bot rules in robots.txt failed at "Classify AI crawler rules".
Validation steps
Classify AI crawler rules
No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.
robots.txt lacks explicit AI crawler rules
Evidence log1 step · 6 lines
Classify AI crawler rules [fail]! No explicit User-agent rules were found for major AI crawler tokens.INFOClassify AI crawler rulesINFOParsing User-agent groups and Allow/Disallow records for known AI crawler tokens evaluatedPath="/"INFOEvaluating exact User-agent matches before wildcard fallback exactAiPolicyCount=0 totalCrawlerTokens=18FAILNo explicit AI crawler User-agent groups were found examplesExpected=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ClaudeBot","Google-Extended","CCBot"]FAILCompare explicit AI crawler coverage actual=0 expected="> 0 explicit non-search AI crawler policies" missingTokens=["GPTBot","OAI-SearchBot","ChatGPT-User","ClaudeBot","Claude-SearchBot","Claude-User","Google-Extended","Applebot-Extended","Amazonbot","Amzn-SearchBot","Amzn-User","PerplexityBot"]INFOResolved effective root-path policy for crawler tokens blocked=0 allowed=21 unspecified=0GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
7 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Answer-first passages
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Answer-first passages
Issue
16 section(s) bury or omit a concise opening answer. No direct definition pattern was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Answer-first passages
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Answer-first passages scored 0/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Evidence and trust
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Evidence and trust
Issue
Missing answer evidence or trust signals: author, publisher, freshnessDate, sameAs.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Evidence and trust
Score
43/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Evidence and trust scored 43/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.
4 Fail
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Question and answer structure
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.
Needs attention
AEO: Question and answer structure
Issue
No natural question headings were detected. No visible FAQ or Q&A pattern was detected. Heading structure issues were detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Question and answer structure
Score
47/100
Status
fail
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Question and answer structure scored 47/100 and needs a fix.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.
3 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Issue
Expected exactly one h1, found 0. No direct definition sentence was detected.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Entity and definition clarity
Score
62/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Entity and definition clarity scored 62/100 and needs improvement.
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Extractable visible copy
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.
1 Warning
GEO, AIO and AEOGEO, AIO & AEOEmerging recommendation
AEO: Extractable visible copy
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.
Needs attention
AEO: Extractable visible copy
Issue
Visible text has few answer-oriented terms or explanatory markers.
Details
Why it matters
Answer engines need visible answer passages, clear question and heading structure, entity definitions, evidence, and trust signals. These signals improve extraction and attribution, but they do not guarantee answer-engine citations or search features.
Check name
AEO: Extractable visible copy
Score
81/100
Status
warning
Category
GEO, AIO & AEO
Maturity
Emerging recommendation
Goal
Make page content easy for answer engines and assistants to extract, answer from, and attribute without promising inclusion in any proprietary answer surface.
Result
AEO: Extractable visible copy scored 81/100 and needs improvement.
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
100 Fail
Agent Ease of UseGoogle Agentic BrowsingBrowser audit
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Check name
Accessibility tree is not well-formed
Score
0/100
Status
fail
Device
desktop
Category
Google Agentic Browsing
Fix guidance
A well-formed [accessibility tree](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/agentic-browsing/accessibility-for-agents) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page.
Evidence
{
"description": "A well-formed [accessibility tree](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/lighthouse/agentic-browsing/accessibility-for-agents) helps AI agents to navigate and interact with the page."
}Sign in to see 45 other issues and the full report
Create a free account to unlock every issue, evidence details, exports, and higher free limits.
Fix with MCP or CLI
Use this report as the handoff into remediation. Generate a coding-agent prompt with the failing checks attached, or jump to the MCP and CLI setup docs before your next rescan.
Score history